On Thursday 12 November 2009 19:58, Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Nov 12, 2009, at 11:29 AM, Talin wrote:
> > Well, as far as intp goes (or iptr if you prefer - the naming
> > convention in LLVM is i<size>)
>
> How about "intptr".
I read this as "pointer to integer." iptr is slightly better because
it follows the i<size> convention.
-Dave