[LLVMdev] Any objections to removing 'win32/...' subtree from LLVM?

[Chandler Carruth]

On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
>
> On Nov 6, 2009, at 9:10 AM, Óscar Fuentes wrote:
>
>> Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> writes:
>>
>>> FYI, I'll plan on removing this subtree on Monday of next week if no
>>> one else chimes in requesting a reprieve...
>>
>> The Visual C++ project files are still there.
>>
>> Anyone objected by private e-mail? Can we know the reasons just in
>> case
>> we can enhance the cmake build on accordance? In the past, the only
>> reason for not removing win32/ was that the cmake-generated project
>> files are not relocatable. As the win32/ project files seem out of
>> date
>> for months now, I reckon that the user who had that requirement
>> switched
>> to cmake.
>
> Removed in r86358.  I don't know what happened to Chandler.

Sorry, fires broke out this week. Was going to do it this weekend, but
you got there first.

>
> -Chris
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>