[LLVMdev] [PATCH] llvm-config: add svn revision to --version
Benjamin Kramer
benny.kra at googlemail.com
Mon May 18 13:51:27 PDT 2009
Óscar Fuentes wrote:
> Why do you use `svn info' and not `svnversion'?
bad habit. I'm not very familiar with svnversion and its output.
> And this brings another question: how do you deal with modified
> working
> copies?
We could add a M or "dirty" to the revision number. But I don't know
how this would affect things like "if (revision >= 12345)".
> This is easy: see the logic for regenerating llvm-config when the file
> that contains the library dependencies changes.
hmm, sounds reasonable since it's in the same Makefile. But I probably
won't have time to look into this until thursday. Damn exams. If
anyone likes to volunteer: just do it ;)
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list