[LLVMdev] Unit test patch, updated
Misha Brukman
brukman at gmail.com
Thu Mar 19 15:02:00 PDT 2009
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
> On Jan 5, 2009, at 11:37 AM, Misha Brukman wrote:
>
> 2009/1/1 Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com>
>
>> On Jan 1, 2009, at 1:21 AM, Talin wrote:
>> > I'm thinking that getting unit tests for the classes in ADT should
>> > be an early goal.
>>
>> Can I suggest the AP[S]Int class? If you look in llvm/test/Integer
>> you'll see a whole bunch of tests that really want to be unit tests
>> but that aren't. :(
>
>
> Chris, do you mean *all* the .ll files in that dir should become unittests,
> or are you talking about some specific files that should be unittests, and
> others that should stay as llvm-as/llvm-dis tests?
>
> I'm assuming a##.* are prime candidates, what about the others? Are the
> double llvm-as/llvm-dis tests about bitcode printing/parsing or are they
> really testing some auto-simplification built-in to the APSInt class?
>
> Oh, sorry, I just meant the "a*" tests, which are basically doing constant
> folding (but not checking the results!)
>
Here's a patch with conversion of a1.ll to unittest format, let me know if
this is what you had in mind.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090319/76bff96d/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: APSIntTest_a1.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 3872 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090319/76bff96d/attachment.patch>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list