[LLVMdev] Suggestions for improvements to the GC docs.
Jon Harrop
jon at ffconsultancy.com
Thu Mar 5 18:46:42 PST 2009
On Thursday 05 March 2009 21:01:43 Talin wrote:
> ...the 'derived' pointer...
The docs and LLVM GC API currently assume that GC references are just a single
pointer. That is overly restrictive and, indeed, cannot even express the GC
that I just wrote. I would like to see that generalized.
--
Dr Jon Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/?e
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list