[LLVMdev] llvm-as regression
bagel99 at gmail.com
Sat Jul 25 09:40:08 PDT 2009
On Fri Jul 24 17:00:52 CDT 2009 Eli Friedman eli.friedman at gmail.com wrote:
>On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Bagel<bagel99 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> The following causes an assertion in recent svn pulls, but not in 2.5.
>> The assertion:
>> llvm-as: /home/bgl/work/llvm-work/include/llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h:125: T&
>> llvm::SmallVectorImpl<T>::operator(unsigned int) [with T = llvm::Constant*]:
>> Assertion `Begin + idx < End' failed.
>Fixed in r77005.
>> The .ll code:
>> target datalayout = "e-p:32:32:32-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:32:32"
>> target triple = "x86-unknown-unknown"
>> @foo = constant [4 x [0 x i8]*] [
Anton Korobeynikov wrote:
> I'm awfully sorry - I was pretty busy to include your patches to LLVM
> mainline but hope to do this during this weekend. Apple folks just
> released their "alternative" of libgcc. It might be pretty interesting
> thing for msp430: http://compiler-rt.llvm.org/
> [0 x i8]* bitcast( [5 x i8]* getelementptr( [5 x i8]* @.str1 ) to [0 x i8]* ),
You're using getelementptr in a slightly strange way here; it isn't
illegal, but LLVM would never generate it because of the constant
> I'm not sure how to proceed on tracking down the cause.
gdb is your friend; a backtrace made the issue pretty obvious.
More information about the llvm-dev