[LLVMdev] [patch] CodeEmitter Memory Foot Reduction
clattner at apple.com
Thu Jul 16 11:34:30 PDT 2009
On Jul 16, 2009, at 10:04 AM, Aaron Gray wrote:
> I understand that you say that, but I can't bring myself to care at
> this point. Have you thought about how many cycles are already used
> to produce the instructions that lead to the emission of those 10K
> bytes? The total percentage of time spent doing these virtual calls
> will be tiny compared to the total time to generate the code.
> If you switch to using virtual functions, get the code working, and
> we *measure* a performance problem, then we can fix it. There are
> much better ways to do this than templating the whole code emitter.
> That means JIT code also has the virtual function overhead too, this
> will slow down existing JIT code. Templates are already there and
> they work and they do not take up _too_ much memory.
As I said before, if you are compelled to, feel free to continue with
your approach of premature optimization. I will fix it later.
More information about the llvm-dev