[LLVMdev] LLVMContext: Suggestions for API Changes
devlists at shadowlab.org
Wed Jul 15 10:56:23 PDT 2009
Le 15 juil. 09 à 19:07, Owen Anderson a écrit :
> On Jul 15, 2009, at 9:53 AM, John Criswell wrote:
>> Owen Anderson wrote:
>>> On Jul 15, 2009, at 7:44 AM, John Criswell wrote:
>>>> 1) If technically possible, add the new API first, get it working,
>>>> llvmdev describing the old and new APIs, provide some lead time for
>>>> people to change over, and then remove the old APIs. This makes it
>>>> easier to plan when I fix problems due to LLVM API changes and
>>>> when I
>>>> can work on our own bugs. :)
>>> The high-level change was already described and discussed on
>> First, did you discuss it or announce it? There's a difference.
>> With its high traffic volume, I don't read all llvmdev mails
>> anymore. I
>> pick and choose based on their subject lines. A subject entitled
>> Change: LLVMContext" will probably get my attention while
>> "Multi-threading support for LLVM" will not.
> How about a subject line "[LLVMdev] MAJOR API CHANGE: LLVMContext"?
You mean like this subject ?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the llvm-dev