[LLVMdev] LLVMContext: Suggestions for API Changes

Jean-Daniel Dupas devlists at shadowlab.org
Wed Jul 15 10:56:23 PDT 2009

Le 15 juil. 09 à 19:07, Owen Anderson a écrit :

> On Jul 15, 2009, at 9:53 AM, John Criswell wrote:
>> Owen Anderson wrote:
>>> On Jul 15, 2009, at 7:44 AM, John Criswell wrote:
>>>> 1) If technically possible, add the new API first, get it working,
>>>> email
>>>> llvmdev describing the old and new APIs, provide some lead time for
>>>> people to change over, and then remove the old APIs.  This makes it
>>>> easier to plan when I fix problems due to LLVM API changes and  
>>>> when I
>>>> can work on our own bugs. :)
>>> The high-level change was already described and discussed on  
>>> LLVMdev.
>> First, did you discuss it or announce it?  There's a difference.
>> With its high traffic volume, I don't read all llvmdev mails  
>> anymore.  I
>> pick and choose based on their subject lines.  A subject entitled  
>> "API
>> Change: LLVMContext" will probably get my attention while
>> "Multi-threading support for LLVM" will not.
> How about a subject line "[LLVMdev] MAJOR API CHANGE:  LLVMContext"?

You mean like this subject ?


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090715/a6884799/attachment.html>

More information about the llvm-dev mailing list