[LLVMdev] -msse3 can degrade performance
Jon Harrop
jon at ffconsultancy.com
Fri Jan 30 21:43:29 PST 2009
On Saturday 31 January 2009 03:42:04 Eli Friedman wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Jon Harrop <jon at ffconsultancy.com> wrote:
> > I just remembered an anomalous result that I stumbled upon whilst
> > tweaking the command-line options to llvm-gcc. Specifically, the -msse3
> > flag
>
> The -msse3 flag? Does the -msse2 flag have a similar effect?
Yes:
$ llvm-gcc -Wall -lm -O3 -msse2 *.c -o scimark2
$ ./scimark2
Composite Score: 525.99
FFT Mflops: 538.35 (N=1024)
SOR Mflops: 472.29 (100 x 100)
MonteCarlo: Mflops: 120.92
Sparse matmult Mflops: 585.14 (N=1000, nz=5000)
LU Mflops: 913.27 (M=100, N=100)
But -msse does not:
$ llvm-gcc -Wall -lm -O3 -msse *.c -o scimark2
$ ./scimark2
Composite Score: 540.08
FFT Mflops: 535.04 (N=1024)
SOR Mflops: 469.99 (100 x 100)
MonteCarlo: Mflops: 197.38
Sparse matmult Mflops: 587.77 (N=1000, nz=5000)
LU Mflops: 910.22 (M=100, N=100)
That was x64 and I get similar results for x86.
Is there some kind of contention between the integer and SSE registers?
--
Dr Jon Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/?e
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list