[LLVMdev] uses of unwind lead to crashes

[Chris Lattner]

On Jan 29, 2009, at 12:15 AM, Duncan Sands wrote:

> Hi John,
>
>> If I understand you correctly, one interim measure would be to update
>> the code generators that don't support unwind to explicitly signal an
>> error, no? You could always have a -compile-anyway command-line flag
>> that tells the code generator to do its best, for users that want to
>> proceed with the unsupported feature.
>
> I agree that quietly producing wrong code is bad.  If Chris agrees,
> I'll teach the code generator to abort if it encounters an "unwind".
> This seems a particularly good idea given how often this comes up :)

Makes sense to me!

-Chris