[LLVMdev] Criticism of garbage collection support in LLVM
Florian Weimer
fw at deneb.enyo.de
Sun Jan 18 13:27:37 PST 2009
* Daniel Berlin:
> It's nice that he claims it's way too high overhead without any, you
> know, data.
I was quite suprised by the performance of the conservative
Boehm-Demers-Weiser collector, even in cases where I thought it was
sub-par. So benchmarking available solutions makes sense indeed. 8-)
(Lack of continuations is probably a better excuse if you don't want
to use LLVM, especially if you don't want to perform whole-program
analysis.)
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list