[LLVMdev] win32/llvm.sln, win32/clang.sln
Óscar Fuentes
ofv at wanadoo.es
Thu Jan 15 05:50:45 PST 2009
Mondada Gabriele <g.mondada at etel.ch> writes:
> I just moved to the CMake solution. By the way, the generated libs
> haven't the same names.
Which ones? The only difference is that we now generate .lib files where
.obj were generated on the past, and require a parameter to be passed to
the linker for including them on the final executable.
> In my opinion, we have to choose one way and remove the other one. If
> it helps, you can put in the win32 directory the result of CMake,
On the release tarball? It seems a good idea (as far as someone
volunteers to do the work) but someone mentioned on this thread that the
project files generated with CMake contains absolute paths.
> or add a script that generate this win32 directory with cmake.
The amount of work saved by such script would be almost nil, and it can
cause problems on setups with more than one compiler installed.
--
Oscar
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list