[LLVMdev] direct calls to inttoptr constants[MESSAGE NOT SCANNED]
Mark Shannon
marks at dcs.gla.ac.uk
Wed Feb 11 04:47:32 PST 2009
Tobias,
I'm doing something similar (I use LLVM as part of my JIT compiler) and
if I remember correctly, LLVM does the correct thing.
I think you need to try changing the i64 value to an i32 value.
If that doesn't work you could also try replacing the tail call with a
normal call.
Mark.
Tobias wrote:
> I'm compiling code which contains indirect function calls
> via their absolute addresses, which are known/fixed at compile-time:
>
> pseudo c code:
> int main() {
> int (* f)(int) = (int (*)(int))12345678;
> return (*f)(0);
> }
>
> the IR looks like:
> define i32 @main() nounwind {
> entry:
> %0 = tail call i32 inttoptr (i64 12345678 to i32 (i32)*)(i32 0) nounwind
> ret i32 %0
> }
>
> on X86 llc 2.4 compiles this to:
> .text
> .align 16
> .globl main
> .type main, at function
> main:
> subl $4, %esp
> movl $0, (%esp)
> movl $12345678, %eax
> call *%eax
> addl $4, %esp
> ret
> .size main, .-main
>
> .section .note.GNU-stack,"", at progbits
>
> take a look at:
> movl $12345678, %eax
> call *%eax
>
> does anyone know a way to cause llc to call the address directly?
> hints where to start patching the codegen are also welcome.
>
> expected assembly:
> call *12345678
>
> best regards
> tobias
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list