[LLVMdev] rol/ror llvm instruction set

[Bill Wendling]

On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
>> I guess I could ask you the opposite question: What is the benefit of
>> having these? They would have to be mappable to the source language in
>> some way. I'm not sure about Ada, but I don't know of a "rotate"
>> operator for any of the C variants, or any other high-level language..
>
> Ada has rotate.
>
Ada has so much. :-) How do you stand on the "LLVM IR-level rotate
instruction" issue? Has it been a pain for you to produce good code
without it?

-bw