[LLVMdev] LLVM asserts

[Daniel Dunbar]

I asked Chris to make this change (but on IRC, so I guess it wasn't
visible on the list).

This matches what we do for cfe-* and one really nice benefit of
getting in the Reply-All habit is that the reply goes both directly to
the sender and to the list.

The problem I perceived was that LLVM is getting so much traffic that
it is quite easy for people to miss replies to commit messages (i.e.,
review feedback) unless they get the message personally.

 - Daniel

On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Tanya Lattner<lattner at apple.com> wrote:
>
> On Aug 19, 2009, at 12:57 PM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen wrote:
>
> On 19/08/2009, at 21.50, Anton Korobeynikov wrote:
>
> Hello, Jakob
>
> I have done that too recently. Did Mailman stop setting the ReplyTo
>
> header?
>
> Yes. So, now you should use "reply all", not "reply". It's quite hard
>
> to change the habits :(
>
> Oh, it was on purpose? I'll have to practice then.
>
> Yesterday I replied to one of my own list posts. I felt rather stupid
> when that one landed in my inbox. (^_^)
>
>
> I guess Chris changed it, so I'll change it back to what he had it. It
> probably would have been better to make an announcement on the list though
> ;)
> Chris - Can you comment on list why you made this change?
> Thanks,
> Tanya
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
>