[LLVMdev] Lost target in Triple

[Daniel Dunbar]

Hi Yonggang,

I cherry picked some parts of this patch in r7931{4,5}.

The other changes I'm not sure about.

1. Re: mingw, looks fine to me to unify them, but I need someone to
sign off on this (since in theory there could be a difference between,
say, i386-unknown-mingw23 and i386-unknown-mingw64 which someone cares
about).

2. Re: Making the arm and thumb patterns more open; I'd rather not do
this. I'd actually prefer to make the patterns more restrictive, for
example only accept things like 'armv{4t,5,6,7}' instead of 'armv.*'.
Likewise for ppc (my understanding is ppc-x-y has never been a valid
triple). If these changes were only made to synchronize the code with
the patterns clang was accepting, we should go with the more
restrictive tests for now.

Thanks!

 - Daniel

On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 7:22 PM, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo)<luoyonggang at gmail.com> wrote:
> Notice!! sorry for that, the patch is incorrect, i attached the new one.
>
>
>
> --
>         此致
> 礼
> 罗勇刚
> Yours
>    sincerely,
> Yonggang Luo
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
>