[LLVMdev] Suggestion for VM porting to LLVM

[Mike Stump]

On Apr 4, 2009, at 1:20 AM, Gabriele Farina wrote:
> Which approach do you suggest ? are there any alternatives ?

My take, do the second one first, gain some experience and have some  
fun.  You can use this to double check the performance and  
suitability.  But mid-term, I'd say, do both.  This allows you to  
compare the performance of each solution against the other, compile  
time, compile time memory pressure, run time and run time memory  
usage.  You're then in a better position to decide which path suits  
what usage styles you have.  Long term, you can then see if it makes  
sense to trim a solution out.