[LLVMdev] Unwinds Gone Wild

[Nicolas Geoffray]

I guess Duncan's answer in this thread is the best answer to give:

<<Once that [The exception handling stuff needed by llvm-gcc] was done I guess everyone took a breather and kind of forgot about unwind>>

So yes, ultimately, unwind will be supported and clang/llvm should provide its own unwinding runtime. 

Patches welcome :)

Cheers,
Nicolas

OvermindDL1 wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 1:50 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote:
>   
>> /* snip */
>>     
>
> Just for another voice in here.  'unwind' and its kin would also be
> useful for me, especially since this is on platforms without GCC (nor
> is GCC used in any way in any step anywhere).
>
> Why does it generate GCC only constructs anyway, that does not sound
> very much like the multi-platform that LLVM is targeting.
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>