[LLVMdev] non-signed integer Type

[Chris Lattner]

On Sep 19, 2008, at 2:16 PM, Scott Graham wrote:

> Hi
>
> Is there any rationale written down for why integer types don't carry
> (perhaps optional) signs somewhere? I feel like I might have read it
> somewhere before (and I see that it used to exist pre 2.0), but I
> can't find anything now.

There is some motivation in this talk:
http://llvm.org/pubs/2007-07-25-LLVM-2.0-and-Beyond.html

-Chris