[LLVMdev] gfortran link failure in current llvm svn

[Tanya M. Lattner]

Sorry, all of this is too late for 2.4.

-Tanya

On Thu, 30 Oct 2008, Jack Howarth wrote:

> Chris and Bill,
>   I have tested the proposed patch from...
>
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2008-August/016490.html
>
> under i686-apple-darwin9 and it solves the problems building gfortran
> from llvm svn. The resulting compiler works fine so can we get that
> patch in before 2.4 is release?
>           Jack
> ps We do have one oddity left in llvm-gfortran from current llvm
> svn. I find everytime I compile something with llvm-gfortran that
> I get a series of warning messages...
>
> f951: warning: command line option "-Wformat" is valid for C/C++/ObjC/ObjC++ but not for Fortran
> f951: warning: command line option "-Wformat-security" is valid for C/C++/ObjC/ObjC++ but not for Fortran
> f951: warning: command line option "-Wno-format-extra-args" is valid for C/C++/ObjC/ObjC++ but not for Fortran
> f951: warning: command line option "-Wno-format-zero-length" is valid for C/C++/ObjC/ObjC++ but not for Fortran
> f951: warning: command line option "-Wno-nonnull" is valid for C/C++/ObjC/ObjC++ but not for Fortran
>
> Is this something we can suppress easily for the 2.4 release?
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>