[LLVMdev] LLVM 2.4 problem? (resend)

[Duncan Sands]

> True, but note that it is the address of a variable that is used, not  
> the value.

Yes, but why do you think they should get a different address?  I can
understand that it is surprising that they do, but determining whether
this is legal or not requires reading the language standard.  Hopefully
a language lawyer can chime in and say whether this transform is valid
or not.

Ciao,

Duncan.