[LLVMdev] RefineAbstractType
David Greene
dag at cray.com
Wed Nov 12 17:07:19 PST 2008
On Wednesday 12 November 2008 18:58, Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Nov 12, 2008, at 3:37 PM, David Greene wrote:
> >>> Unfortunately, calling FunctionType::refineAbstractType(opaque, void
> >>> (...))
> >>> doesn't work because RefineAbstractType doesn't recurse down into
> >>> the
> >>> pointee types.
> >>
> >> What types are you starting out with? If you had the equivalent of:
> >>
> >> %t1 = type opaque
> >> %t2 = type void(%t1*)
> >>
> >> and you refine t1 -> t2, it should work.
> >
> > I'm not sure it will. %t1* is the "contained" type inside the
> > FunctionType.
> > RefineAbstractTypes expects the OldType (%t1 in this case) to be in
> > the
> > contained type set. Since a _pointer_ to %t1 is in the contained
> > set, it
> > doesn't see it.
>
> How is this any different than the struct case of {\2*} ?
I don't know. All I know is when I called %t2->refineAbstractType(%t1, %t2)
it didn't work. That was the pointer of the question. RefineAbstractTypes
doesn't "see" beyond the pointer type.
I think the answer is that I have to resolve the pointer type, not the
function type:
%t1 = type opaque
%t1.5 = type %t1 *
%t2 = type void(%t1.5)
%t1.5->refineAbstractType(%t1, %t2)
-Dave
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list