[LLVMdev] Validating LLVM

[Bill Wendling]

On Nov 11, 2008, at 11:00 PM, Óscar Fuentes wrote:

> Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> writes:
>
> [snip]
>
>> All four of the above should be run on at least a nightly basis (more
>> frequently for some, like the regression tests). Each of these are
>> automated, making that easy. If there are no regressions from the
>> above four, we could tag that revision as being potentially "valid".
>
> If a new test case is created (coming from a bug report or a code
> review, not from adding a new feature) and it fails for a previously
> "valid" revision, is the tag removed?
>
There would probably be some sort of concept of "last known good". In  
the above case, either the tag could be removed and/or a new valid  
revision tagged. It was "good" up until that point, at least. :-)

-bw