[LLVMdev] DejaGnu test-suite coverage
Chris Lattner
sabre at nondot.org
Tue May 27 20:50:06 PDT 2008
On May 26, 2008, at 11:55 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote:
> This would make the summary of
> <http://chandlerc.net/llvm-coverage/lib/Target/PowerPC/
> PPCHazardRecognizers.cpp.gcov.html>
> much more favorable.
>
> I'm not seeing the bad aspect of this particular file? It has pretty
> good coverage, is code calling into this "bad"? If so, then
> assertions, or logging or something might be more appropriate.
> Coverage just says that it got used, not that its use was
> "correct". ;]
I think he means the lines like:
switch (Opcode) {
default: assert(0 && "Unknown load!");
where the default case is never executed.
-Chris
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20080527/96d6be36/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list