[LLVMdev] MultiSource/Applications/lemon slow in JIT
Chris Lattner
sabre at nondot.org
Wed May 21 14:05:09 PDT 2008
On Wed, 21 May 2008, Mike Stump wrote:
> On May 21, 2008, at 11:45 AM, Török Edwin wrote:
>> The forking was introduced because the runtime was too small;
>
> I think this direction is wrong. I'd rather have some infrastructure
> that can get nanoseconds or tick counters and print them... This then
> allows for a microbenchmark suite, which I think fits in nicely with
> the llvm philosophy.
No, this is completely inappropriate for llvm-test.
-Chris
--
http://nondot.org/sabre/
http://llvm.org/
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list