[LLVMdev] More info, was Help needed after hiatus
Richard Pennington
rich at pennware.com
Sat May 17 11:34:04 PDT 2008
Hi,
I know my last question was very vague (i.e. "It stopped working, what
went wrong?"), so here is a little more concrete example:
If I run the optimizer (opt) on this code snippet with -std-compile-opts
the optimizer hangs.
; ModuleID = 'test.ubc'
target datalayout =
"e-p:32:32:32-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:32:64-f32:32:32-f64:32:64-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64-s0:0:64-f80:32:32"
target triple = "i686-pc-linux-gnu"
declare void @BZALLOC(i32)
define void @f(i32) {
entry:
%blockSize100k = alloca i32 ; <i32*> [#uses=2]
store i32 %0, i32* %blockSize100k
%n = alloca i32 ; <i32*> [#uses=2]
load i32* %blockSize100k ; <i32>:1 [#uses=1]
store i32 %1, i32* %n
load i32* %n ; <i32>:2 [#uses=1]
add i32 %2, 2 ; <i32>:3 [#uses=1]
mul i32 %3, ptrtoint (i32* getelementptr (i32* null, i32 1) to
i32) ; <i32>:4 [#uses=1]
call void @BZALLOC( i32 %4 )
br label %return
return: ; preds = %entry
ret void
}
This is generated from this test program:
extern void BZALLOC(int s);
void f(int blockSize100k)
{
int n = blockSize100k;
BZALLOC( (n+2) * sizeof(unsigned int) );
}
Besides the optimizer hanging, the strange thing about this is that it
doesn't hang if the blockSize100k variable is a local rather than a
parameter or if the n+2 is changed to n+1 (!?!).
Is this code intrinsically incorrect, especially the getelementptr for
sizeof(), or should I look at the optimizer? It seems to be hanging in
the createInstructionCombiningPass.
-Rich
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list