[LLVMdev] optimization assumes malloc return is non-null

[Chris Lattner]

On May 14, 2008, at 12:06 PM, Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote:
> Also:
>
> 1 Can you suggest anything in addition to the rationale documents that
>  I should go read?

Hi Jonathan,

This is an excellent resource:
http://www.knosof.co.uk/cbook/cbook.html

> 2 Since these questions aren't really specific to LLVM, do you know  
> of a
>  more appropriate place where I might ask them?

comp.lang.c.moderated is a great place to start.

-Chris