[LLVMdev] Size and performance figures for LLVM?

[Dominic Hamon]

Bill Wendling wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 2:24 AM, Joachim Durchholz <jo at durchholz.org> wrote:
>   
>> Am Dienstag, den 13.05.2008, 00:42 -0700 schrieb Bill Wendling:
>>     
>>> Sorry to step into this in the middle of a thread, but what exactly is
>>> LLVM's autoconf doing that "autoconf shouldn't do if properly set up"?
>>>       
>> 1) Variables like CC, CXX, CFLAGS don't work properly when submitted via
>> the command line. The handling seems to be inconsistent, i.e. it seems
>> that parts of the toolchain receive these flags, others don't.
>> This is just a cosmetic problem, of course.
>>     
>
> Is this specifying CC, CXX, and CFLAGS during the "configure" process
> or during the "make" process? The Makefiles seem to be using them in a
> fairly consistent manner, as far as I can see. Which parts of the
> toolchain don't get the flags? Also, are we talking LLVM or LLVM-GCC?
>
>   
As an example: When running make from my own project that uses llvm (and 
the llvm makefiles), I am unable to add extra include paths to the 
build. It seems that they get into the makefiles ok, but not through to 
the compiler itself.