[LLVMdev] Preferring to use GCC instead of LLVM

[Bill Wendling]

On May 12, 2008, at 11:55 PM, kr512 wrote:
> me22.ca wrote:
>> You said that if I have to install GCC, you might as well
>> just use it for everything.  That statement very clearly
>> doesn't apply anymore, since it's binutils that's the
>> dependency.  Or if you still stand by it, it means that
>> you consider GCC to also be "incomplete".
>
> How do I get the necessary binutils on Windoze?  Install
> MinGW or Cygwin.  But if I do that, then I may as well use
> MinGW for everything and not bother with LLVM.
>
You should. The GCC guys are much nicer than we are. They love to  
answer questions such as yours.

-bw