[LLVMdev] Path to AutoRegen.sh
Alexandre Machado
axmachado at gmail.com
Wed May 7 10:57:38 PDT 2008
Hy, Tanya
> Some comments:
> - Please follow the developers policy for making patches:
> http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#patches
>
OK. My fault here. Will check some of your observations and resubmit.
> - I think if we are going to upgrade, we should totally switch to 2.6
> instead of allowing both. This will make diffs easier to read when people
> regenerate the configure script.
>
Agree... but we must be sure if it does not brake anything. I'm running
out of time with the current project, but, after it finishes, can look
to.
> - Did you read autoconf/README.txt? Were there no changes to the m4
> macros or configure.ac?
Well... at least there where no changes in macros used by the sample
project. But, if we are meant to migrate the whole LLVM to 2.6, I need
to investigate it further.
>
> - You should also regenerate the configure script as part of this patch.
>
Ok.
> - Does libtool also have to be upgraded?
Don't know. I'm using 1.5.24, but don't know if it will work with other
versions. It's another think I need to check.
> - Lastly, I think we should postpone applying this patch until after the
> 2.3 branch creation. I'm leary of making tool changes so close to the
> release.
>
Agree. Sent it just because, as a beginner with LLVM, it was a pain to
start a new project in my environment, and I know there are a lot of
other ubuntu users out there, but it's not necessary to hurry.
> -Tanya
Thanks
Alexandre
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list