[LLVMdev] Spilled variables using unaligned moves
Dale Johannesen
dalej at apple.com
Mon Jul 14 11:46:19 PDT 2008
On Jul 14, 2008, at 11:37 AMPDT, Chris Lattner wrote:
>
> On Jul 14, 2008, at 7:43 AM, Nicolas Capens wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> It looks like vector spills don’t use aligned moves even though the
>> stack is aligned. This seems like an optimization opportunity.
>
> What target is this? Linux doesn't have a 16-byte aligned stack.
>
> -Chris
It does now:) Anton (I think) implemented dynamic stack alignment for
functions with XMM variables.
Note the "and esp" in the fragment below.
>> The attached replacement of fibonacci.cpp generates x86 code like
>> this:
>>
>> 03A70010 push ebp
>> 03A70011 mov ebp,esp
>> 03A70013 and esp,0FFFFFFF0h
>> 03A70019 sub esp,1A0h
>> ...
>> 03A7006C movups xmmword ptr [esp+180h],xmm7
>> ...
>> 03A70229 mulps xmm1,xmmword ptr [esp+180h]
>> ...
>> 03A70682 movups xmm0,xmmword ptr [esp+180h]
>>
>> Note how stores and loads use unaligned moves while it could use
>> aligned moves. It’s also interesting that the multiply does
>> correctly assume the stack to be 16-byte aligned.
>>
>> Is there something I’m doing wrong (again), or is this already known?
>>
>> Thanks a lot,
>>
>> Nicolas Capens
>>
>> <fibonacci.cpp>
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20080714/90b92015/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list