[LLVMdev] Refusing to store single element
Chris Lattner
sabre at nondot.org
Wed Jul 9 10:38:02 PDT 2008
On Wed, 9 Jul 2008, Nicolas Capens wrote:
> I'm hitting the following assert in PredicateSimplifier.cpp:961 :
Hi Nicolas,
The predsimplify pass is experimental at best, and should be removed at
worst. I don't think it is going to be futher developed, so I'd suggest
staying away from it.
-Chris
>
>
> assert(!CR.isSingleElement() && "Refusing to store single element.");
>
>
>
> If I ignore it the generated code appears correct so I'm not sure what this
> assert is supposed to be for. Am I doing something wrong on my end or is
> this a superfluous assert or it really indicates an LLVM bug?
>
>
>
> The code I'm generating is fairly long but if necessary I could try to boil
> it down.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Nicolas
>
>
-Chris
--
http://nondot.org/sabre/
http://llvm.org/
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list