[LLVMdev] Problems expanding fcmp to a libcall
Richard Osborne
rlsosborne at googlemail.com
Fri Jul 4 02:16:32 PDT 2008
Evan Cheng wrote:
> On Jul 3, 2008, at 3:07 PM, Richard Osborne wrote:
>
>>> This seems to break the convention. It should be the responsibility
>>> of the caller to further legalize the results.
>>>
>>> Evan
>>>
>> That makes sense. In that case I believe
>> SelectionDAGLegalize::LegalizeSetCCOperands
>> should be legalizing the result. The description of this function
>> says it tries to create a
>> legal LHS and RHS but it this case it fails to return a legal LHS.
>> The following patch allows me to
>> compile my original file.
>>
>> --- LegalizeDAG.cpp~ 2008-07-03 23:03:35.000000000 +0100
>> +++ LegalizeDAG.cpp 2008-07-03 23:03:38.000000000 +0100
>> @@ -4749,7 +4749,7 @@
>> Tmp1 = DAG.getNode(ISD::OR, Tmp1.getValueType(), Tmp1, Tmp2);
>> Tmp2 = SDOperand();
>> }
>> - LHS = Tmp1;
>> + LHS = LegalizeOp(Tmp1);
>> RHS = Tmp2;
>> return;
>> }
>>
>
> Ok, I think this is the right patch. Do you have commit access?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Evan
>
I don't have any commit access. Would you be able to submit this for me?
Cheers,
Richard
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list