[LLVMdev] [Patch] Adding unit tests to LLVM

Misha Brukman brukman at gmail.com
Sat Dec 27 20:01:29 PST 2008


2008/12/27 Mark Kromis <greybird at mac.com>

> Is this something your planning as putting in the tree,
>> thus require pulling in changes from google (license allowing), or does user
>> need to have the libraries/headers pre-installed?
>>
>
> Including it in the tree is the most reasonable thing to do. No point in
> inconveniencing the user over tiny libraries with liberal licenses.
>
> I didn't get to look at the license.
>

http://code.google.com/p/googletest/ ->
http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php .

> One other nice feature of using gtest is that it integrates with gmock, one
> of the only really good C++ mocking libraries available. It was just
> recently released.
>
> Just briefly looked at the googlemock site and it sys about needed tr1
> library. Third paragraph in System Requirements. It just struck me as
> amusing that visual c++ people need boost then.
>

This is getting slightly off-topic (we're now talking about mocking
libraries, rather than unittesting), but Visual Studio 2008 has a free
add-on pack to add TR1 support:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/visualc/default.aspx (see the downloads
section).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20081227/470d541f/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list