[LLVMdev] Eliminating gotos
Sebastian Pop
sebpop at gmail.com
Wed Aug 13 00:47:40 PDT 2008
Hi Ben,
On 12/08/2008 16:40, "Daniel Berlin" <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote:
>> [bg] Actually this does not need to be the case. The paper that I sighted
>> does not use code replication to resolve irreducible control flow but
>> instead introduces a loop construct.
>
Right, and that technique introduces scalar control variables that replace
control flow with data flow.
>
> We implemented this in GCC back when we first started GIMPLE (since
> GIMPLE is based on the IL the authors of that paper used in their
> compiler), and the code size increases on a bunch of testcases were
> massive due to extra loop constructs.
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 10:50 AM, Benedict Gaster
<benedict.gaster at amd.com> wrote:
> Do you have any pointers to the test cases in question?
See the thread starting at:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-05/msg00109.html
You can get a copy of the ast-optimizer branch as of May 2002 from the
svn of GCC and apply the patches from that email. That prototype still
can work for you ;-)
Sebastian Pop
--
AMD - GNU Tools
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list