[LLVMdev] LLVMBuilder vs LLVMFoldingBuilder

[Dominic Hamon]

Dominic Hamon wrote:
> Duncan Sands wrote:
>>> Another option that was discussed in #llvm is to nuke LLVMBuilder 
>>> and rename LLVMFoldingBuilder to LLVMBuilder. If this was the case, 
>>> I'd argue for a flag in the Builder that could retain the old 
>>> non-folding functionality for debugging purposes.
>>>     
>>
>> this plan sounds good to me.  However it's not clear to me how useful a
>> debug flag would really be.
>>
>>  
>
> This is my first patch so please let me know if there are any problems 
> or anything I need to do differently.
And there were. updated patches attached.
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: llvm.IRBuilder.patch
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20080410/056c5781/attachment.ksh>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: llvm-gcc42.IRBuilder.patch
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20080410/056c5781/attachment-0001.ksh>