[LLVMdev] Virtual methods (was: LLVMBuilder vs LLVMFoldingBuilder)

[Mike Stump]

On Apr 4, 2008, at 3:59 PM, Joachim Durchholz wrote:
>
> I'm not sure how hard (a) really is. It's being done in other  
> imperative
> OO languages, and quite successful there (the SmartEiffel folks have
> reported they can eliminate the vtable lookup in about 90% of call
> sites,

Are those the folks that don't do separate compilation or dynamic  
libraries?  :-)