[LLVMdev] Virtual methods (was: LLVMBuilder vs LLVMFoldingBuilder)
Chris Lattner
sabre at nondot.org
Fri Apr 4 13:06:03 PDT 2008
On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, Joachim Durchholz wrote:
>> Please verify that this actually happens in practice with llvm-gcc and
>> gcc.
>
> If that's already the case (which I'll gladly believe), where does the
> performance overhead for virtual functions come from?
> (Just curious.)
I don't understand what you're asking. Please rephrase.
-Chris
--
http://nondot.org/sabre/
http://llvm.org/
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list