[LLVMdev] movaps being generated despite alignment 1 being specified

[Dale Johannesen]

On Oct 18, 2007, at 1:52 PM, Chuck Rose III wrote:
> High order bit:
>
> Presence of a called function is causing a store on an unrelated  
> vector to generate an aligned store rather an unaligned one despite  
> unaligned store being indicated in the associated StoreInst.
This probably means the compiler believes the stack pointer is 16- 
byte aligned in non-leaf functions.
This would be correct if (a) the SP was aligned coming in and (b) the  
size of the stack decrement
(including return address, etc.) is a multiple of 16.  I haven't been  
following the Linux problems
closely, but I think "the stack issue being worked on" is that (a) is  
not always correct?


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20071018/18f2ab96/attachment.html>