[LLVMdev] LLVM with Microsoft Visual Studio
Jeff Cohen
jeffc at jolt-lang.org
Wed Mar 14 08:37:06 PDT 2007
Morten Ofstad wrote:
> I just spent an hour to get the latest CVS version and compile it with
> VS2005 -- apart from a small problem with an outdated bison on my
> system I ran into a few problems. First of all there seems to be some
> dependency problem with Intrinsics.gen so the first time you build it
> has not been generated before the first time it's included. I suspect
> this is the same with VS2003 if you make a completely clean checkout
> from CVS and try to build. Second, the VS2005 compiler gives an error
> when compiling
No, even with a completely clean checkout there are no problems with VS
2003. Most likely, VS 2005 make a mistake converting a project file.
As I've seen every version of VS mess up the migration of the previous
version's files, I bet this is what happened.
Your version of bison should work now. The newer versions have
developed a bad habit of making semicolons optional.
> TargetInstrInfo.h:getPointerRegClass() (line 386) because the function
> doesn't return a value (it abort()s so it's not really a problem),
> just add this line at the end of the function:
>
> return NULL; // Must return a value in order to compile with VS 2005
Fixed. VS 2003 (and GCC) are smart enough to know abort() doesn't
return. Looks like a bug introduced in VS 2005.
>
> There's a ton of warnings, a few of which seem to be 'real' but most
> are just noise - I don't have time to go through them, but I can mail
> you the build logs if you're really interested.
Sure, mail it to me. Sometimes there's a real bug hiding in there. The
vast bulk of the warnings are 32/64-bit portability warnings and are
potentially real issues, especially when having LLVM cross-compile from
one to the other (which is why I don't suppress them). GCC doesn't seem
capable of detecting these, so nothing stops the vast majority of LLVM
developers from introducing more of them.
>
> Last there is an annoyance in that the FileParser.y custom build rule
> doesn't find the output, so it is run every time you build. This
> wouldn't be so bad if it was only this file, but it in turn causes
> Intrinsics.gen to be generated every time and this causes a lot of
> other files to be rebuilt. I hacked the dobison.cmd script so it never
> detects bison and always copies the .cvs files to get around the bison
> version problem, so I thought I had found the problem when I saw that
> the .output file from bison was entered as one of the outputs of the
> build step. But removing this from the outputs didn't help, it's still
> executing the custom build rule every time. The strange thing is it
> works fine for FileLexer.l.
Again, VS 2003 doesn't have this problem.
>
> Anyway, it was not too much trouble to get it going - I can check that
> it works again before the 2.0 release of LLVM if you remind me to...
Thanks, that would be great :)
>
> m.
>
>
>
>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list