[LLVMdev] Status of pre-legalize vector changes
Christopher Lamb
christopher.lamb at gmail.com
Mon Jun 11 17:46:04 PDT 2007
On Jun 11, 2007, at 3:39 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, Dan Gohman wrote:
>
> In particular, you should be able to introduce a new [V]CONCAT_VECTOR
> node, which takes two input vectors and yields an output vector
> that has
> length equal to the sum of the input vectors. Likewise, instead of
> the
> extract_element hack, we should have an EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR node of some
> sort.
>
> Since no target support these nodes, they would all be expanded by
> legalize.
It may be possible to codegen EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR on some targets once
subreg support is in.
--
Christopher Lamb
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20070611/81400439/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list