[LLVMdev] API design

[Chris Lattner]

On Tue, 3 Jul 2007, David Greene wrote:
>> That's pretty close to what I was thinking.  I think it's a good solution.
>
> I'm happy to go do this but I'm wondering if we should include some
> concept-checking code or something equivalent to ensure that we're
> passed random access iterators.
>
> What do you all think?

Please keep it simple :).  We can deal with ugly error messages if it 
explodes.

-Chris

-- 
http://nondot.org/sabre/
http://llvm.org/