[LLVMdev] Bogus X86-64 Patterns

David Greene dag at cray.com
Mon Dec 17 10:04:09 PST 2007

On Friday 14 December 2007 13:55, Evan Cheng wrote:
> Actually, movq is recognized by the assembler on Leopard. I've fixed
> this:
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-
> Mon-20071210/056334.html
> Please verify. Thanks.

The patch is similar to what I did.  I'll have to create an llvm testcase to
verify it as this is a Fortran code.  It would also be good to have a
regression test for this anyway.

Does the Leopard assembler support movq for rr instructions?  The
rep64 movd sequence is ugly and esoteric.  It's much more readable
to say movq.


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list