[LLVMdev] PointerType API Change
Christopher Lamb
christopher.lamb at gmail.com
Sun Dec 16 22:48:12 PST 2007
On Dec 16, 2007, at 10:22 PM, Anton Korobeynikov wrote:
> Christopher,
>
>> The API for getting PointerType objects has just changed to make
>> Embedded C address space information explicit. The old semantics of
>> PointerType::get() now apply to PointerType::getUnqual(), which
>> returns a pointer in the generic address space. PointerType::get()
>> now
>> requires both a type and an address space.
> What is the reason of such change?
Sorry for not providing that. Here's the conversation with Chris:
> On Dec 12, 2007, at 1:32 AM, Christopher Lamb wrote:
>
>> On Dec 11, 2007, at 4:12 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:
>>
>>> Making the address space default to zero is convenient, but
>>> dangerous. This means that xforms that play with pointers need
>>> to be
>>> very careful to propagate this info in some cases. Do you think
>>> this
>>> is the best way to go? Do many clients of PointerType::get need to
>>> be aware of addr spaces?
>>>
>>
>> I'm going to add a new method for getting a pointer type
>> 'PointerType::getUnqual()' that only takes an element type, the
>> standard 'PointerType::get()' will take both an element type and
>> address space with no default values. This should at least make it
>> explicit in the code which clients do not pass in an address space.
>> There are currently many clients, so this should help make the work
>> incremental.
>
> Excellent idea,
>
> -Chris
>
--
Christopher Lamb
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20071216/f0662bc8/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list