[LLVMdev] ocaml binding question
gordonhenriksen at mac.com
Wed Dec 12 05:39:17 PST 2007
On Dec 12, 2007, at 08:16, Jon Harrop wrote:
> On Monday 10 December 2007 23:52, Gordon Henriksen wrote:
>> On 2007-12-10, at 18:28, Jon Harrop wrote:
>>> Incidentally, should more OCaml stuff beyond the bindings be part
>>> of LLVM or would it be better to fork them into a separate project
>> Can you be more specific than "stuff"?
> I'm thinking of a library that compiles an AST represented by an
> OCaml data structure into the appropriate calls to LLVM. Ultimately,
> with support for exceptions and a run-time.
Since that ASTs are by definition language-specific, such should
probably be a separate project because LLVM itself is language-agnostic.
More information about the llvm-dev