[LLVMdev] APFloat.h header file usage
kremenek at apple.com
Sat Dec 8 11:48:43 PST 2007
On Dec 8, 2007, at 11:33 AM, Reid Spencer wrote:
> Okay, but I imagine that leaves it still being used in APFloat.cpp
> is also trying to be segregated to the support module.
>> If this doesn't seem like a clean enough solution, there are other
>> ways to potentially decouple APFloat more from the Serialization
>> "library." The tradeoff is that it would require some code
>> addition, and could potentially make deserialization of APFloats (as
>> done in the new C frontend) slightly less efficient.
> I doubt the light performance loss will make any significant
> Further, putting all the serialization code in one translation unit
> have some benefit for a) clarity (one place to go instead of all over
> the place) and b) might perform better due to cache effects because it
> isn't spread all over the executable.
> Could you take the necessary steps to decouple APFloat from the
> serialization stuff and any other serialized data structures that live
> in lib/Support, lib/ADT or lib/System? That would help me get the
> separation going. While you're doing that, I'll be working on the
> makefile cleanup. Hopefully, soonish, we can have llvm module actually
> use the support module.
Before I make any changes, I'd like to point out that the
serialization code for APFloat is not actually included in
APFloat.cpp, and instead is in two source files that are linked into
libLLVMBitReader.a and libLLVMBitWriter.a respectively. So the only
dependence within APFloat.h on the serialization stuff is the forward
declarations of Serializer and Deserializer respectively.
Consequently, there shouldn't be any build issues with clients that
want to use APFloat but don't want to use the Serialization.
I agree that, when possible, from an interface perspective it is
probably cleaner to not have the serialization logic embedded in the
LLVM ADT class declarations. I'll look into decoupling the APFloat
interface from it's serialization logic on Monday, although the steps
I would need to take shouldn't be a blocking issue for you.
More information about the llvm-dev