[LLVMdev] Debug+Checks Testing

Duncan Sands baldrick at free.fr
Wed Aug 22 16:33:23 PDT 2007


Hi David,

On Tuesday 7 August 2007 21:15:03 David Greene wrote:
> I believe things are in a state now where it makes sense for folks to do
> periodic testing with --enable-expensive-checks to check for C++ library
> misuse.  Already the last couple of weeks I've fixed several of these kinds
> of bugs that were introduced with new code.

I see that the way of constructing a CallInst was changed to avoid problems with
--enable-expensive-checks, but it looks like InvokeInst was not changed.

Ciao,

Duncan.



More information about the llvm-dev mailing list