[LLVMdev] Extending AsmPrinter

[David Greene]

On Thursday 16 August 2007 11:59, Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Aug 2007, David A. Greene wrote:
> >>> and thus won't be real useful for Windows.
> >>
> >> Why not just use the unlocked stdio calls?
> >
> > Because I'm lazy.  :)
>
> It seems much easier to use a robust and well tested system than invent a
> new crazy scheme ;-)

Actually, there's another reason not to use unlocked calls.  They require
POSIX compliance.

To get portability and most of the performance I plan to look at unbuffered 
stdio.

                                              -Dave