[LLVMdev] Virtual "components" for llvm-config
Chris Lattner
sabre at nondot.org
Thu Mar 23 22:37:25 PST 2006
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Eric Kidd wrote:
>> I'd have to derive the actual set of required libraries, but I'm lacking
>> motivation for that task right now.
>
> OK, here's my current minimalist proposal:
>
> backend: Either a native backend or a C backend.
> engine: Enough libs to run ExecutionEngine using either a JIT or
> interpreter.
> all: All LLVM libraries.
>
> Please feel free to suggest better names. :-)
Instead of 'engine', how about "jit" and "interpreter". Of course I'd
think that "jit+interpreter" would also work (or something).
-Chris
--
http://nondot.org/sabre/
http://llvm.org/
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list