[LLVMdev] Thread support: desirable or not?

[Evan Jones]

On May 14, 2005, at 13:28, Reid Spencer wrote:
>> This is definitely *not* something that should go in before 1.5 is
>> released, but I would love to see it integrated shortly after.
> Okay.

Now that 1.5 has been released, would it be possible to have some 
discussion about if linking the JIT with a thread library is the 
direction that should be taken? I don't see any alternative except 
having separate "threaded" and "unthreaded" JITs, and requiring the 
user to know when the different JITs should be used.

Thanks,

Evan Jones

--
Evan Jones
http://evanjones.ca/